Thursday, 2 April 2026

Easter Treat

AM traveling to the Northamptonshire market town of Daventry today for the Four Nations Chess League's Easter congress, which has three seven-round tournaments over four days: open, U2000 and U1700.
I have entered the U2000, which, with 65 entries, is easily the biggest of the tournaments.
All three have what can be thought of as the modern standard time-control of 90 minutes plus a 30-second increment.
Two halfpoint byes are allowed, and I am taking mine in the morning rounds on Saturday and Monday.
Players in the open include two grandmasters - full details at the 4NCL.

Wednesday, 1 April 2026

League Chess

PLAYED on board one (of four) for Battersea against Lewisham last night in Croydon & District League's Dave Luckin division, where teams are allowed a rating total of 6,600 elo, ie a player-average of 1650.

Anthony Agu (2091) - Spanton (1921)
Spanish Berlin
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.d3 Bc5 5.c3 d5!?
Much more common is 5...0-0, but the pawn-thrust is growing in popularity
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
6.exd5
Stockfish17.1 and Dragon1 like the text and 6.Nbd2. Naturally, 6.Nxe5 is possible, but after 6...0-0! note that 7.Nxc6 bxc6 8.Bxc6 runs into 8...Bxf2+!, with a sharp position that the engines reckon favours Black.
6...Qxd5
The engines prefer this over 6...Nxd5.
7.Bc4 Qd6
This is the commonest queen-retreat in ChessBase's 2026 Mega database.
8.0-0 0-0
Now both sides have castled, how would you assess the position?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
Black has more space in the centre, but White can take the initiative on the queenside, and the engines reckon this is the slightly more important factor.
9.b4 Bb6 10.a4 a6
This may be a novelty. The engines prefer 10...e4!?, when 11.dxe4 Qxd1 12.Rxd1 Nxe4 gives equal chances, according to Stockfish17.1, although Dragon1 gives White an edge.
11.Ba3 Ne7 12.Nbd2 Bf5 13.Qb3 Rad8!?
The engines fluctuate a lot, but come to more-or-less agree Black should play 13...c6 or 13...Ng6.
14.Ng5
Perhaps best is 14.a5 Ba7 15.b5 Bc5 16.Nxe5!? Qxe5 17.d4 Qf4 18.Bxc5, when White is a pawn up, has the bishop-pair and is better coordinated.
14...Bg6 15.a5 Ba7 16.Nde4 Nxe4 17.Nxe4 Qd7 18.b5 axb5 19.Qxb5 c6!?
The engines give this as best.
20.Qxe5!?
Withdrawing the queen to b2 or b3 maintains a bigger advantage, according to the engines.
20...Rfe8 21.Nc5 Qc8!? 22.Qg5 Nd5 23.a6?
The engines reckon White is slightly better after 23.Qd2.
23...b5 24.Bb3 Nxc3 25.h4?
Too slow. The engines suggest 25.Kh1!? or 25.Bb2, but prefer Black.
25...Rd4
Even stronger, according to the engines, is 25...Ne2+, and then 26...Rd4 or 26...Nd4.
26.Rfe1 Ne2+ 27.Kf1
How should Black proceed?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
27...h6??
27...Rg4 can be met by 28.Be6!, so best may be 27...Bxc5 28.Bxc5 Rg4 29.Qd2 Rxh4!? 30.f3 Qd8!, with equal chances, according to the engines.
28.Qxg6
The engines reckon White's advantage is worth more than a rook.
The game finished:
28...Rxh4!? 29.Bxf7+ Kh8 30.Ne6 Rxe6 31.Qxe6 Qxe6 32.Bxe6 Nd4 33.Bh3 b4 34.Bb2 Rf4 35.Re8+ Kh7 36.Re7 Rxf2+? 37.Kxf2 Nf5+ 38.Rxa7 1-0
The match ended 2-2.
My Battersea Season 2025-6
Date       Event  Colour  Rating  Opp's Rating  Score  Season's Perf
16/9/25   CLL       W       1936         1952             0           1552
18/9/25   CLL       W       1936         1797             =           1675
16/10/25 CLL       W       1889         2047             0           1665
23/10/25 CLL       B        1889         1823             1           1805
18/11/25  LL         W       1891         1980             =           1840
20/11/25  CLL      W       1891         1866             1            1911
25/11/25  BCC     B        1891         1817             1            1955
9/12/25    LL         W       1904         1982             1            2008
16/12/25  LL         B        1904         2046             0            1968
18/12/25  CLL      B        1904         2066             1            2018
6/1/26      CLL      W       1929         2150             =            2066
7/1/26      LL         W       1929         1971             =            2058
8/1/26      CLL      B        1929         1800?           =            2038
13/1/26    LL         B        1929         2035             1            2067
27/1/26    LL         B        1929         2089             0            2041
29/1/26    CLL      B        1929         1882             =            2031
3/2/26      BCC     W       1928         1836             1            2043     
12/2/26    CDL      B        1928        1890              1            2057
25/2/26    LL         B        1928        1863              =            2047
26/2/26    CLL      B         1928        2015             0            2025
3/3/26      CDL      B        1914        1976              1            2043
24/3/26    BCC     W        1921        1780             1            2049
26/3/26    CLL      B         1921        1942             =            2045
31/3/26    CDL      B        1921         2091             0            2030           
CLL: Central London League
LL: London League
BCC: Battersea club championship
CDL: Croydon & District League
I also have a win-by-default in the Central London League

Tuesday, 31 March 2026

Miniatures 32

IN this occasional series I am going through my decisive games of 20 moves or fewer.

R White (?) - Spanton (147 BCF)
Highbury (London) Rapidplay 1990
King's Indian Attack
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d3!?
White, going first, can afford liberties like this, which may be why the position after 3.d3!? occurs 4,216 times in ChessBase's 2026 Mega database, with players on the white side including Nimzowitsch, Capablanca, Barcza, Benko, Shirov, Ehlvest, Topalov and Gukesh. Perhaps the idea is to take the opponent out of book, but it is also possible, as happens in this game, to transpose into lines of the King's Indian Attack with a quick g3.
3...Nf6 4.Nbd2 Be7 5.g3 d6
Stockfish17.1 and Dragon1 reckon 5...d5 gives Black a slight edge.
6.Bg2 Bg4 7.0-0 Qd7!?
Raising the spectre of opposite-side castling
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
8.Re1 0-0!?
Cold feet? I cannot recall, but, for what it is worth, the engines are not keen on castling on either side at this point, suggesting instead 8...h5!?
9.c3 Ne8!?
Probably a novelty - the move is not in Mega26.
10.Nf1 Bh3 11.d4 Bxg2 12.Bxg2 exd4
How should White recapture?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
13.Nxd4!? 
Dragon1 prefers 13.cxd4, but Stockfish17.1 fluctuates between the two moves.
13...Nf6 14.h3 Rfe8 15.Nf5!?
The engines strongly dislike this, preferring 15.Bf4 or 15.f3!?
15...Bf8
Preserving the bishop-pair and unmasking pressure against e4. The engines now suggest 16.c4, albeit awarding Black a slight edge.
16.Qg4?? 0-1
RW resigned without waiting for 16...Nxg4.
LESSON: blunders do not come much bigger than putting the queen en prise, but there is always an underlying cause for such moves, and here I suggest it was a case of concentrating so much on one's own threats that the opponent's possibilities were overlooked.

Monday, 30 March 2026

Miniatures 31

IN this occasional series I am going through my decisive games of 20 moves or fewer.

P Orn (150 BCF) - Spanton (147 BCF)
Highbury (London) Rapidplay 1990
QGD
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 Be7 5.e3 0-0 6.Nf3 Nbd7 7.Be2!?
This has been played by grandmasters, but trails 7.cxd5, 7.Qc2, 7.Bd3 and especially 7.Rc1 in popularity.
7...dxc4!?
Offering a transposition, which is accepted, to 7.Bd3 lines.
8.Bxc4
This position occurs 2,244 times in ChessBase's 2026 Mega database
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
8...Nd5!? 9.Bxe7 Nxe7 10.0-0
Now both sides have castled, how would you assess the position?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
White's extra central space and lead in development give a slight edge, according to Stockfish17.1 and Dragon1.
10...c5 11.Qc2 cxd4 12.Nxd4 b6?
Better is 12...Nf6.
How can White exploit Black's last move?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
13.Qe4
White has the upper hand after this, according to the engines, but they prefer 13.R(either)-d1 and 13.Bxe6!? fxe6 14.Nxe6  Qe8 15.Nc7 etc.
13...Rb8 14.Bd3
Again the engines like R(either)-d1, but not 14.Bxe6?? as Black has 14...Nc5.
14...Nf6 15.Qf4 Bb7 16.Bc2 Ned5 17.Nxd5 Qxd5 18.f3??
Spotting one threat (18...Qxg2#), but missing:
18...e5
The game finished:
19.Be4 exf4 0-1
LESSON: don't stop thinking when you have spotted an opponent's threat - the most dangerous moves have more than one idea.

Sunday, 29 March 2026

Miniatures 30

IN this occasional series I am going through my decisive games of 20 moves or fewer.

D Muroko (174 BCF) - Spanton (147 BCF)
London League 1990
Spanish Berlin
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 Nf6 4.0-0 Nxe4 5.d4 Be7!?
This is very much second in  popularity to 5...Nd6, but has been played by Carlsen, Kramnik and Morozevich.
How should White respond?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
6.Re1
More popular, and preferred by Stockfish17 and Dragon1, are 6.dxe5 and 6.Qe2.
6...d5?!
The main continuation 6...Nd6 is probably better.
7...Bd7 8.Bxc6
Luke Harmon-Vellotti (2409) - Ognjen Matko (2307), Chess.com Blitz 2015, saw 8.Nxd7 Qxd7 9.c3 0-0 10.Nd2, with a slight edge for White, according to the engines (1-0, 37 moves).
8...Bxc6 9.Qg4?!
The engines reckon this makes the queen more of a target than an attacking weapon. They suggest Qe2, either immediately or after first exchanging on c6.
How should Black respond?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
9...0-0!
Coolly done, but everything else loses, according to the engines, eg 9...Bf6? 10.f3!? (10.Nxc6 is also strong), or 9...g6? 10.Bh6.
10.Nxc6
If 10.Bh6, then 10...Bf6.
10...bxc6 11.c4
The engines prefer 11.Nd2 or 11.Qd1!?
11...Bb4!? 12.Rd1 Qf6?
Black is better after 12...f5!?, according to the engines.
13.f3!
Simple, but effective.
What should Black play?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
13...Rae8!
This seems best. The problem with 13...Nd6? is that it loses a piece to 14.a3 Ba5 15.b4 etc.
14.a3!?
Possibly better is grabbing the knight with 14.fxe4, although after 14...Rxe4 15.Qf3 Rxd4 Black has compensation. Nevertheless 16.Bd2!? Qxf3 17.gxf3 Rb8!? 19.Nc3!? Rxc4 20.Rab1 leaves White with a knight for three pawns, and at least a slight edge, according to the engines.
14...Bd6 15.c5?
This is a mistake, although the engines' top choice 15.fxe4 is unclear after 15...Rxe4 16.Qf3, when both 16...Rxd4 and 16...Qh4!? give interesting compensation.
15...Bxh2+! 16.Kxh2
Even worse is 16.Kf1? as after 16...Ng3+ White has to give up the queen to avoid mate in one.
16...Nf2 17.Qg3
Objectively probably better is 17.Qf4, but 17...Qxf4+ 18.Bxf4 Nxd1 leaves White with few hopes.
17...Nxd1 18.Bf4 Nxb2 19.Be5 Qh6+ 20.Kg1 Nd3 0-1
LESSON: check those checks - both your own, and your opponent's.

Saturday, 28 March 2026

Thoughts On Bad Wörishofen IV

MY round-seven game in the Bad Wörishofen seniors was an Old Indian that began 1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.f3!? e5 4.d5 c6 5.c4 Qb6 6.Qb3 Be7 7.Be3 Qxb3 8.axb3, reaching the following position.
Spanton (1919) - Dieter Bauer (1798) after 8.axb3 - notice anything unusual?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
The unusual feature is that queens have come off the board before anything else.
There are 11.7million games in ChessBase's 2026 Mega database - have a go at guessing how many feature the same phenomenon of queens-off first.
A) 35,222 (0.3%)
B) 58,715 (0.5%)
C) 82,202 (0.7%)
D) 105,688 (0.9%)
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
The answer is 35,222 games, which is 0.3% of the games in Mega26.
I have a database with 5,028 of my games, and, since this was the sixth time queens have come off first in those games, my percentage is the even tinier 0.1.
The openings in my games varied: two Rétis and one each of the King's Indian Attack, Slav, Liberated Bishop and Old Indian.
But they have in common that, with the arguable exception of the King's Indian Attack, they were all closed systems.

Friday, 27 March 2026

League Chess

PLAYED on board one (of five) for Battersea 3 against Hackney in Central London League Division Three last night.

Ben Cullen (1942) - Spanton (1921)
Catalan
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.g3 Bb4+ 5.Bd2 Be7 6.Nc3!?
This is third in popularity in ChessBase's 2026 Mega database, a long way behind 6.Qc2 and especially 6.Bg2.
6...c6 7.Bg2 dxc4!?
This is marginally the top choice of Stockfish17.1 and Dragon1.
8.0-0 0-0
With both sides castling fairly early, how would you assess the position?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
Black's extra pawn is not irrelevant, in that White will not find it easy to restore the material balance. But White has a 2-1 majority on the two central files, which might help generate an attack. Equal chances, according to the engines.
9.Qc2 Nbd7 10.Rfd1 Qc7!?
This may be a novelty. The engines prefer the known move, 10...b5, and another possible novelty in 10...a5!? After 10...b5 the engines' main line runs 11.a4 b4 12.Ne4 Nxe4 13.Qxe4 Bb7, with what they reckon are still equal chances. After 10...a5!? they are less sure how play should go, but one sharp line runs 11.Ne5!? Nxe5 12.dxe5 Nd5 13.Ne4 Qc7 14.Nd6!? b5 15.b3!? Bxd6 16.exd6 Qxd6 17.bxc4 bxc4 18.e4!? Nb4 19.Qxc4, when they agree White has sufficient compensation for a pawn.
After 10....Qc7!?, how should White proceed?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
11.e4
The engines like 11.Bf4 Bd6 12.Bxd6 Qxd6 13.a4, or immediately 11.a4.
11...e5 12.dxe5
The engines suggest 12.h3!?, 12.b3!? or 12.Ne2!?
12...Nxe5 13.Nxe5 Qxe5 14.Ne2!?
This is Stockfish17.1's top choice; Dragon1 marginally prefers 14.h3!? But if 14.Bf4, then 14...Qh5 seems a good reply.
14...Be6 15.Bc3 Qc7 16.Nd4 Bg4!? 17.f3 Bd7 18.Qe2
The engines prefer 18.f4.
18...b5 19.e5 Nd5
What should White play?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
20.Nxb5!?
The engines prefer 20.Kh1, 20.f4 or 20.e6. The text restores material equality, but after ...
20...cxb5 21.Rxd5 b4 22.Be1 Be6 23.Rdd1 Rfd8
... Black's queenside pawn-majority is mobile and advanced.
24.f4 Rxd1 25.Rxd1 Rd8 26.Be4 g6 27.Kg2 h5 28.Qc2 Rxd1 29.Qxd1 Qc8!? 30.Bf2 Bc5
The engines give 30...Bh3+ 31.Kh1 c3 with a won game.
31.Bxc5 Qxc5
How should White continue?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
32.Qd8+
The engines reckon 32.Qd6! leaves White only slightly worse.
32...Kh7 33.Qd1
If 33.Qf6, then 33...Qc8! gives Black a positionally won game, according to the engines.
33...a5?
Missing a simple tactic.
34.Qxh5+! Kg7 35.Qg5 Qe3 36.Qf6+ Kg8 37.Qd8+ Kg7 38.Qf6+ Kg7 ½–½
Hackney won the match 3.5-1.5.
My Battersea Season 2025-6
Date       Event  Colour  Rating  Opp's Rating  Score  Season's Perf
16/9/25   CLL       W       1936         1952             0           1552
18/9/25   CLL       W       1936         1797             =           1675
16/10/25 CLL       W       1889         2047             0           1665
23/10/25 CLL       B        1889         1823             1           1805
18/11/25  LL         W       1891         1980             =           1840
20/11/25  CLL      W       1891         1866             1            1911
25/11/25  BCC     B        1891         1817             1            1955
9/12/25    LL         W       1904         1982             1            2008
16/12/25  LL         B        1904         2046             0            1968
18/12/25  CLL      B        1904         2066             1            2018
6/1/26      CLL      W       1929         2150             =            2066
7/1/26      LL         W       1929         1971             =            2058
8/1/26      CLL      B        1929         1800?           =            2038
13/1/26    LL         B        1929         2035             1            2067
27/1/26    LL         B        1929         2089             0            2041
29/1/26    CLL      B        1929         1882             =            2031
3/2/26      BCC     W       1928         1836             1            2043     
12/2/26    CDL      B        1928        1890              1            2057
25/2/26    LL         B        1928        1863              =            2047
26/2/26    CLL      B         1928        2015             0            2025
3/3/26      CDL      B        1914        1976              1            2043
24/3/26    BCC     W        1921        1780             1            2049
26/3/26    CLL      B         1921        1942             =            2045 
CLL: Central London League
LL: London League
BCC: Battersea club championship
CDL: Croydon & District League
I also have a win-by-default in the Central London League

Thursday, 26 March 2026

Thoughts On Bad Wörishofen III

CAPTURING with check nearly always improves your position, often dramatically, and is rarely bad.
It was just my luck that my round-three game in the Bad Wörishofen seniors featured an exception to this usually reliable rule.
The following position was reached after 11 moves of a Caro-Kann Tartakower.
Achim Heller (2045) has just played 11...b5!?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
Stockfish17.1 and Dragon1 reckon White has at least a slight edge after 12.c5.
I intended playing c5, but first played 12.Qc2, thinking I was gaining a tempo thanks to the threat of capturing on h7 with check.
But my opponent 'overlooked' the threat, as I thought, by replying 12...bxc4!
I annotated this as !? in my original post, but really the move deserves an unadorned exclamation mark.
According to the engines, I should have replied 13.Bxc4, with an equal game.
Instead I played 13.Bxh7+ Kh8 14.Ng3!? with a sharp position where, as AH pointed out after the game, 14...g6 is simply good for Black.
The engines reckon White should prefer 14.Be4 or 14.Rae1!?, but agree Black has a slight edge either way.
I still find it hard to believe 13.Bxh7+ is not the best move in the position - there cannot be many examples of such a phenomenon.

Wednesday, 25 March 2026

Championship Chess

PLAYED last night in the Battersea club championship.

Spanton (1921) - Ibrahim Abouchakra (1780)
Sicilian Accelerated Dragon
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 g6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Bg7 5.Nc3 Nc6 6.Nxc6!?
This is fourth in popularity in ChessBase's 2026 Mega database behind 6.Nde2, 6.Nb3 and especially 6.Be3.
6...bxc6 7.Bc4 d6 8.0-0 Nf6 9.e5!?
A pawn sacrifice that divides the engines. Dragon1 reckons it gives White the upper hand; Stockfish17.1 claims it is only enough for equality.
How should Black respond?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
9...Ng4
IA said afterwards he rejected 9...dxe5 10.Qxd8+ Kxd8, which is the main line, because White can capture on f7, but he missed that after 11.Bxf7?? e6 the bishop is trapped.
10.e6?!
Almost certainly better is 10.exd6.
10...Ne5?
Black should play 10...f5.
11.exf7+ Nxf7 12.Bxf7+ Kxf7 13.Qf3+ Kg8?
Apparently a novelty. After 13...Bf6 14.Qxc6 Rb8 White is a pawn up and has the safer king, but Black has the bishop-pair and has the only pawns on the two central files, meaning White is only slightly better (Stockfish17.1) or at best has the upper hand (Dragon1). Indeed the engines reckon White should prefer 14.Ne4!? d5 15.Nxf6 exf6 16.Qc3.
14.Qxc6 Bf5 15.Nd5!?
The engines prefer 15.Re1.
15...Rc8 16.Qb7 Kf7 17.Bg5?!
The engines suggest 17.Qb3!?, 17.Re1 or 17.Qxa7.
How can Black cut White's advantage to a minimum?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
17...Re8?
Better than the text is 17...Rb8, but best is the engines' 17...Qd7!, the point being that, after 18.Qxd7 Bxd7, the capture 19.Bxe7?? loses to 19...Bc6, while 19.Nxe7?! Rc5 20.h4 Bxb2 also favours Black.
18.Rfe1
The engines prefer 18.Qb3.
18...Bf8
Again 18...Qd7! works.
19.Qb3
Can you find a good reply for Black?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
No ... or, to be on the safe side, if you have found a good reply, you have done better than the engines.
19...Bxc2?!
The engines' best is 19...Kg7, but 20.Qe3 leaves White well on top, eg 20...Kf7!? 21.Qf3 Kg8 22.c4!? h6 23.Bf6!? Qd7 24.Bxe7!? (Stockfish17.1), or 20...Qa5!? 21.Nxe7 Bxe7 22.Bxe7 Qb6 23.Qf4 Qxb2 24.Bxd6 (Dragon1).
20.Qf3+
Probably even stronger is 20.Qh3.
20...Kg7
How should White proceed?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
21.Bxe7! Bxe7 22.Rxe7+ Rxe7 23.Qf6+ Kh6 24.Nxe7 Rb8
This, for a short time, is Stockfish17.1's top choice, but objectively best, or, rather, least worst, is probably 24...Ra8.
25.Qf4+ Kg7 26.Nc6 Qb6 27.Nxb8 Qxb8 28.Qd4+ 1-0
The bishop is also dropping.
My Battersea Season 2025-6
Date       Event  Colour  Rating  Opp's Rating  Score  Season's Perf
16/9/25   CLL       W       1936         1952             0           1552
18/9/25   CLL       W       1936         1797             =           1675
16/10/25 CLL       W       1889         2047             0           1665
23/10/25 CLL       B        1889         1823             1           1805
18/11/25  LL         W       1891         1980             =           1840
20/11/25  CLL      W       1891         1866             1            1911
25/11/25  BCC     B        1891         1817             1            1955
9/12/25    LL         W       1904         1982             1            2008
16/12/25  LL         B        1904         2046             0            1968
18/12/25  CLL      B        1904         2066             1            2018
6/1/26      CLL      W       1929         2150             =            2066
7/1/26      LL         W       1929         1971             =            2058
8/1/26      CLL      B        1929         1800?           =            2038
13/1/26    LL         B        1929         2035             1            2067
27/1/26    LL         B        1929         2089             0            2041
29/1/26    CLL      B        1929         1882             =            2031
3/2/26      BCC     W       1928         1836             1            2043     
12/2/26    CDL      B        1928        1890              1            2057
25/2/26    LL         B        1928        1863              =            2047
26/2/26    CLL      B         1928        2015             0            2025
3/3/26      CDL      B        1914        1976              1            2043
24/3/26    BCC     W        1921        1780             1            2049
CLL: Central London League
LL: London League
BCC: Battersea club championship
CDL: Croydon & District League
I also have a win-by-default in the Central London League

Tuesday, 24 March 2026

Thoughts On Bad Wörishofen II

I HAD four blacks in the Bad Wörishofen seniors.
One of those games began with 1.e4, but the other three were closed games, with rounds two and four seeing White play the Colle-Zukertort.
I was also expecting a Colle-Zukertort in round eight as a search in ChessBase's 2026 Mega database seemed to indicate that it was my opponent's favourite opening, but he varied with a New London (1.d4 and 2.Bf4, without an early  Nf3).
So why this sudden upsurge in interest in an opening named after players who died in 1932 (Edgard Colle) and 1888 (Johannes Zukertort)?
One possibility is that there has been a new book or online course devoted to the opening, and I later noticed the bookstall at Bad Wörishofen had a copy of Richard Palliser's The Killer Colle-Zukertort System.
This was published last year, described as an updated version of a a 2022 Chessable course.
Somewhat strangely, I cannot find the book on Amazon, but it is available from Chess & Bridge
One feature of the Colle-Zukertort is that White usually sets up the same way more-or-less whatever Black plays.
Round two after White's fifth move
Round four after White's fifth move
One point of this presumably is that White rarely has to get involved in a deep theoretical argument - it really is an ideas opening.
And a lot of the basic ideas are explained in some detail on the internet, eg at thechessworld and at chess.com.
The latter article is 15 years old, but ideas change slowly in long-established opening systems.
I expect to see a few more examples in my coming games as, if my limited experience at Bad Wörishofen is any guide, it appeals to a wide range of players - my round-two opponent was rated 2031, my round-four opponent 1671.