Monday, 9 March 2026

Miniatures 28

IN this occasional series I am going through my decisive games of 20 moves or fewer.

Spanton (147 BCF) - William Upton (?)
Highbury (London) Rapid 1990
Nimzowitsch Defence
1.e4 Nc6 2.d4 Nf6?!
There are 200 examples of this position in ChessBase's 2026 Mega database, but Black already has a lost game, according to Stockfish17 and Dragon1
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
3.Nc3!?
There seems no good reason not to play 3.d5.
3...d5 4.e5
This is a relatively mainstream position, reached 897 times in Mega26
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
4...Bg4??
Normal is 4...Nd7, as played by Magnus Carlsen, although Edgar Colle back in 1925 preferred 4...Ng8.
5.f3 Bh5 6.exf6 gxf6 7.Bd3 Bh6?? 8.Bxh6 Nxd4 9.Bb5+ Qd7?? 10.Bxd7+ Kxd7 11.Qxd4 Rag8!? 12.Qxd5+ Ke8 13.0-0-0 e6 14.Qd8#
LESSON: for once I am lost for words.

Sunday, 8 March 2026

County Chess

PLAYED on board 15 (of 16) for Kent versus Middlesex in the Southern Counties championship yesterday afternoon.

Ian Calvert (1942) - Spanton (1914)
1.b3
1.b3 d5 2.Bb2 Nf6 3.Nf3 Bf5 4.c4!?
More popular in ChessBase's 2026 Mega database are 4.Nh4!?, 4.d3, 4.g3 and especially 4.e3.
4...e6 5.g3 Nbd7 6.Bg2 Bd6!? 7.0-0 0-0
Now both sides have castled, how would you assess the position?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
It is early days in what looks like being a long positional struggle, but Stockfish17.1 and Dragon1 reckon White has at least the better part of equality.
8.d3 Re8 9.Nbd2 c6 10.Qc2!?
This is the third time against IC I have had the position after 9...c6. The previous two games, in 2002 and 2008, featured 10.a3, and were drawn in 28 and 30 moves respectively.
The engines suggest 10.e4!?, which is possible thanks to the unprotected state of Black's dark-square bishop, eg 10...dxe4 11.dxe4 Nxe4?? loses a piece to 12.Nxe4.
10...e5 11.e4 Bg6 12.Nh4!? d4 13.Nxg6 hxg6
Stockfish17.1 marginally prefers 13...fxg6!?, and Dragon1 comes to more-or-less agree.
14.Nf3
This may be a novelty, and at any rate is an improvement on Gerhard Völpel (2070) - Dierk Schröder (1841), Mecklenburg Seniors Championship (Plau am See) 2001, which went 14.f4? Ng4 15.fxe5 Ne3 16.Qb1 Bxe5, with a large advantage for Black, although the game was agreed drawn three moves later.
14...a5 15.Bc1!?
The engines like this, along with 15.a3.
15...Nc5 16.Bd2 Qe7 17.Rfb1!? Ra7 18.a3 Rea8 19.Bf1 Ncd7 20.Qb2 b5 21.cxb5 cxb5
How should White proceed?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
22.a4?!
The engines are not keen on this, preferring 22.h4!? or 22.Rc1.
22...b4 23.Bg5?!
This is probably the wrong idea too. After 23.Rc1 Nc5 White is no more than slightly worse, according to the engines.
23...Rc7 24.Rc1 Rac8
The engines reckon 24...Rc3!? is even stronger.
25.Rxc7 Rxc7 26.Rc1 Rc3 27.Bd2
How should Black proceed?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
27...Nb8!?
The engines for quite some time much prefer 27...Nc5, but the text comes to be Dragon1's top choice, at least for a while. Either way, the sacrifice of the exchange is sound.
28.Bxc3
Accepting the exchange, either immediately or over the next few moves, seems almost forced, eg the engines come to agree that 28.Bh3!? is the best continuation, but after 28...Na6 reckon White should continue 29.Bxc3.
28...bxc3 29.Qb1
Black has no material compensation for the exchange, but has more than enough positionally, thanks to having an advanced and protected passed pawn, extra space and an outpost at b4
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
29...Ba3 30.Rd1 Qc5 31.Ne1 Na6 32.Nc2 Bb2 33.Be2 Qb6 34.Na1?!
Almost certainly better is the engines' 34.Rf1!?, but they agree Black is winning.
34...Nd7
There is nothing wrong with 34...Bxa1 35.Qxa1 Qxb3, eg 36.Rb1 can be met by 36...Qc2 and 37...Nb4.
35.Rf1 Nc5 36.Bd1?!
Now Black gets to win the d3 pawn, while still menacing the backward b pawn.
36...Bxa1 37.Qxa1 Nxd3 38.Be2 Nab4 39.Rd1 Nc5 40.Bc4!?
The e4 pawn cannot realistically be saved, eg 40.Bf3 c2.
40...Nxe4 41.Re1!?
This sets a sort of trap that does not save Black, but complicates matters.
41...Nc2 42.Qb1 Nxe1 43.Qxe4
This is the point - the knight cannot escape
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
43...Qb4
This wins, but more forcing is 43...c2 44.Qxe1 Qb4, which transposes to the game (but in the game, Black gets another option).
What should White try?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
44.Qxe1
Perhaps it is a matter of taste, as all moves lose, but the engines' 44.f4!? gives Black a chance to go wrong, eg 44...c2? 45.Qa8+ Kh7 46.Bxf7 leaves Black having to bail out with a draw by perpetual after 46...Nf3+ 47.Kg2 Qd2+ 48.Kxf3 Qd3+. Black could vary with 45...Qf8, but 46.Bxf7+ Kxf7 47.Qd5+ leaves White with a draw by perpetual. Note that the key points about 44.f4!? are, firstly, that it attacks e5, and, secondly, that it takes away the g5 square from Black's king, which is why the immediate 44.Qa8+ fails to 44...Qf8 45.Bxf7+ Kxf7 46.Qd5+ Kf6. However, 44.f4!? does not save Black - the engines show both 44...Qe7 and 44...Nf3+!? win. Note that 44.Qxe5? is instantly hopeless after 44...Nf3+.
44...c2
Transposing to the line given in the note to Black's 43rd move.
45.Qc1 Qc3 46.Kg2 e4 47.Bd5
Or 47.Bxf7+!? Kxf7 48.Qf4+ Kg8.
47...Qf3+ 48.Kh3 Qd1 49.Qf4 Qh5+ 50.Kg2 Qf3+ 0-1
Middlesex won the match 8-5-7.5.

Saturday, 7 March 2026

Miniatures 27

IN this occasional series I am going through my decisive games of 20 moves or fewer.

Thomas Hauptmann (166 BCF) - Spanton (147 BCF)
Guernsey 1990
Scotch
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 Bc5 5.Nb3
This was the main move 36 years ago, but has been massively overtaken by the Kasparov-popularised 5.Be3. Nevertheless, in ChessBase's 2026 Mega database it scores 56%, two percentage points more than 5.Be3, and also two more than the other popular continuation, 5.Nxc6.
5...Bb6 6.Nc3 Nf6 7.Bd3
More popular are 7.Bg5 and especially 7.Qe2!?, but the text has also been played by grandmasters.
7...d6 8.0-0
This game is the first in Mega26 to reach this position
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
8...Bg4
Stockfish17 and Dragon1 suggest 8...h6 or 8...Ne5!?
9.Qe1
Subsequently, 9.Be2 became slightly more popular, but the text is probably better.
9...0-0
Now both sides have castled, how would you assess the position?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
The most significant factor in the position is probably White's central space advantage. The engines give White a slight edge.
10.Be3 Bxe3 11.Qxe3 Re8 12.Qg3 Qd7
The engines prefer 12...Be6 or 12...Nb4!?
13.h3 Bh5?!
Probably the wrong retreat.
14.f4 Re7?
The engines give 14...h6, but much prefer White.
15.Qh4 Rae8 16.Nd5 Nxd5 17.exd5 Be2?!
'Better', but still losing, is 17...Nb4.
18.Qxh7+ 1-0
LESSON: the game could be dismissed as being simply decided by tactical mistakes, but the underlying factor was that White's central dominance made Black's position harder to play.

Friday, 6 March 2026

Openings From Weimar VII

THE following position was reached in round seven, when I was Black against Achim Heller (2048).
White has just played 11.Nd2-c4
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
I replied with 11...cxd4, which is Dragon1's second choice, marginally behind 11...Be7, whereas Stockfish17.1 fluctuates between 11...Be7 and 11...Bc7. My choice is objectively not bad - the engines do not even flash yellow.
After 12.Nxd6 Qxd6 13.Qxd4 (the engines agree this is best) Qxd4 14.Nxd4 Rd8 Black has traded the bishop-pair for easy development.
White has a slight edge, but the simplified position should be easily held by Black - easily, that is, for an engine.
For a human, as I was to discover, it is another matter.
It took White a further 60+ moves to bring home the full point, but AH was in the pleasant situation of being able to play on 'for ever', safe in the knowledge that only two results (a white win or a draw) were at all likely.
In other words, 11...cxd4 was objectively sound, but practically an error.

Thursday, 5 March 2026

Openings From Weimar VI

MY round six game, in which I was Black against Wilfried Adam (1828). developed into a King's Indian Attack or, arguably, the Closed Variation of the Sicilian.
Here I want to look at an interesting point right at the start of the game - the interesting bit being not so much the moves themselves, as the engines' reactions to those moves.
When the initial position on the board, before a move has been made, is first set up on a computer, White has a slight edge, according to Stockfish17.1 and Dragon1.
White is better
The latter engine sticks to this verdict, but Stockfish17.1, if allowed enough time, comes to regard the opening position as equal, albeit giving White the better part of equality.
After the game's 1.e4, the verdicts naturally do not change, but 1...c5 sees Dragon1, but not Stockfish17.1, marginally increase White's edge.
My game continued 2.d3.
Clearly this is not a dynamic move, but it opens a diagonal for White's dark-square bishop and supports e4.
Ture, it also restricts White's light-square bishop, but that is not so important as the king's bishop is headed for g2.
However, the engines, while not calling 2.d3 a mistake, are far from happy with it - indeed, Stockfish17.1 regards Black as now being close to having a slight edge, and certainly reckons Black has the better part of equality.
I find it hard to believe 2.d3 is so bad as to amount to a swing in evaluation of almost half a pawn.
Certainly Dragon1, which, remember, was less keen on 1...c5, is not so critical of 2.d3, but nonetheless awards Black a minute edge.
Assuming the engines are right in their evaluations, and I realise that is quite an assumption when purely positional moves are under consideration, this goes to show how important it is to be active in the opening, and not to just make a vaguely useful move - what Garry Kasparov tends to call a half-move.

Wednesday, 4 March 2026

League Chess

PLAYED on board one (of four) for Battersea against Coulsdon last night in Croydon & District League's Dave Luckin division, where teams are allowed a rating total of 6,600 elo, ie a player-average of 1650.

Ishan Ramdewar (1976) - Spanton (1914)
QGD Exchange
1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Bg5 c6 6.e3 h6!?
An early ...h6 used to be taboo in the Exchange Variation of the Queen's Gambit Declined. The thinking was twofold. Firstly, if played before White castled, it was feared White could castle long and use the pawn as a hook for a kingside pawnstorm. Secondly, if White castled short, it was thought the third rank on the kingside should be left uncluttered as Black might want to place a rook and/or queen there to attack the white king's position. But 6...h6!? has been played by Carlsen, Kramnik, Ding, etc. What changed? Engines quite like the move, rating it marginally better than the common 6...Be7.
7.Bh4 Be7 8.Bd3 0-0 9.Nge2!?
This is massively more popular than the 'traditional' Nf3.
9...Re8 10.0-0
The position after 10.Qc2 Nbd7 11.0-0-0!? occurs 136 times in ChessBase's 2026 Mega database, but 11...b5 gives Black the upper hand, according to Stockfish17.1 and Dragon1.
Now both sides have castled, how would you assess the position?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
Mega26 has 702 examples of this position, with White scoring a very good 59%. The engines reckon White is slightly better.
10...Nh5!? 11.Ng3!?
This seems to be a novelty. The engines prefer 11.Bxe7, followed by queenside play.
11...Bxh4 12.Nxh5!?
The engines marginally prefer this over capturing with the queen.
12...Qg5??
Blundering a piece ... or, at least, it should.
How does White win a piece?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
13.Nf4??
There is no satisfactory answer to the simple 13.g3, eg 13...Bg4 can be met by 14.Be2, after which the black dark-square bishop cannot be saved.
13...Qf6 14.Qc2 Be6
The engines much prefer 14...Qd6, claiming equality.
15.g3 Bg5 16.Nxe6 Qxe6
Not 16...Rxe6?? 17.f4 Rxe3 18.fxg5 Qxd4 19.Bh7+ and 20.Kg2.
17.b4 a6 18.a4 Nd7 19.b5 axb5 20.axb5 Rxa1!? 21.Rxa1
How should Black proceed?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
21...Bxe3??
The engines suggest 21...g6, 21...Rb8 or 21...Nb6, but in each case give White the upper hand.
22.Bf5 Qe7 23.Bxd7 Bxf2+ 24.Qxf2 Qxd7
How big is White's advantage?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
Two pawns come nowhere close to compensating for a knight in this middlegame position, especially with two white queenside pawns effectively holding back three black ones. The engines reckon White is approximately the equivalent of 2.5 pawns ahead.
25.Re1?!
This gives away much of White's advantage.
25...Rxe1+ 26.Qxe1 Qg4?!
After the 'ugly' 26...cxb5! Black has counterplay thanks to having a passed pawn and the safer king.
27.Qe8+ Kh7 28.Qe5 Qf3 29.Ne2?!
White is still winning after 29.Qe1, according to the engines.
29...cxb5!
'Ugly', but effective. Black now has three isolated pawns, but the engines agree having a passer is much more important.
30.Nf4 Qd1+ 31.Kg2 Qc2+?!
It is a game of equal chances after 31...b4, according to the engines.
32.Kh3?!
The engines give White the upper hand after 32.Qe2, one point being 32...Qxe2+?! 33.Nxe2 b4 fails to 34.Nf4!
32...Qd1?
The game is completely equal, according to the engines, after both 32...b4 and 32...Qc8+ 33.Kg2 b4.
33.Qf5+ Kg8
White to play and win
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
34.Qxd5?
Both 34.Qd3 and 34.Nxd5 seem good enough for at least a slight edge, but winning is 34.Qc8+ Kh7 35.Qxb7 as 35...Qf1+ 36.Kg4 Qd1+ comes to nothing after 37.Kf5, eg 37...Qxd4 38.Qxb5 g6+ 39.Kg4 h5+ 40.Kh3, although the whole line is not easy to envisage from the diagram.
34...g5 35.Qd8+ Kg7
White to play and draw
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
36.Nd5??
White has a draw after no fewer than seven moves, according to the engines, including 36.Ne6+!?, 36.Qd5, 36.Qe8 and 36.Qc7.
Black to play and win
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
36...Qf1+ 37.Kg4 f5+ 38.Kh5 Qh3#
Coulsdon defaulted on board three, but the match was drawn 2-2..
My Battersea Season 2025-6
Date       Event  Colour  Rating  Opp's Rating  Score  Season's Perf
16/9/25   CLL       W       1936         1952             0           1552
18/9/25   CLL       W       1936         1797             =           1675
16/10/25 CLL       W       1889         2047             0           1665
23/10/25 CLL       B        1889         1823             1           1805
18/11/25  LL         W       1891         1980             =           1840
20/11/25  CLL      W       1891         1866             1            1911
25/11/25  BCC     B        1891         1817             1            1955
9/12/25    LL         W       1904         1982             1            2008
16/12/25  LL         B        1904         2046             0            1968
18/12/25  CLL      B        1904         2066             1            2018
6/1/26      CLL      W       1929         2150             =            2066
7/1/26      LL         W       1929         1971             =            2058
8/1/26      CLL      B        1929         1800?           =            2038
13/1/26    LL         B        1929         2035             1            2067
27/1/26    LL         B        1929         2089             0            2041
29/1/26    CLL      B        1929         1882             =            2031
3/2/26      BCC     W       1928         1836             1            2043     
12/2/26    CDL      B        1928        1890              1            2057
25/2/26    LL         B        1928        1863              =            2047
26/2/26    CLL      B         1928        2015             0            2025
3/3/26      CDL      B        1914        1976              1            2043
CLL: Central London League
LL: London League
BCC: Battersea club championship
CDL: Croydon & District League
I also have a win-by-default in the Central London League

Tuesday, 3 March 2026

Openings From Weimar V

ONE of the fastest growing black defences - growing in the sense of increasing in popularity - is the Tartakower Variation of the Caro-Kann: 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Nf6 5.Nxf6+ exf6.
It arose in my round five game at the Thuringia seniors' championships, in which I was White against Erich Krüger (2033).
There was a time when theoreticians more-or-less condemned 5...exf6, certainly regarding it as inferior to 5...gxf6.
Reuben Fine in The Ideas Behind The Chess Openings (Bell, 1948) wrote that "Black has no compensation for his minority of pawns on the queenside; the sole reason why he can so often draw in practice is that the white majority is so hard to exploit."
Fine insisted: "Regardless of how White continues, Black's game remains too passive."
Raymond Keene in The Openings In Modern Theory And Practice (Bell & Hyman, 1979) said of 5...exf6: "Black's kingside is extremely solid, and the deterioration in his pawn-structure is not likely to cause him too many problems, since reduction to an instant pawn ending is unlikely."
But he added: "Black can normally hold the draw, but should hardly hope for more unless White overpresses."
Even a relatively-modern specialist book on the opening, for example Joe Gallagher's Starting Out: The Caro-Kann (Everyman, 2002), while calling ...exf6 more solid than ...gxf6, claimed "it's not thought of too highly these days."
Gallagher explained: "Variations where Black accepts a disadvantage and just tries to hang on for the draw are not very popular nowadays."
So why has ...exf6 leapt to prominence?
Wikipedia reckons the variation "offers Black rapid development, though also ceding White the superior pawn-structure and long-term prospects (Black has to be cautious that the d-pawn is now a potential passed pawn in the endgame)."
No one can argue against White's pawn-structure being superior in an ending, but does the position really offer Black "rapid development"?
After all, in the diagram, neither side has a piece developed, and it is White to move, so is there any reason why Black's development should be, relative to White's, rapid?
I decided it would be interesting, and instructive, to look at what normally happens in the Tartakower, using ChessBase's 2026 Mega database as the reference point.
White usually continues 6.c3, which occurs 56.8% of the time (11,480 games out of 20,229).
Immediately, White appears to have given away the advantage of the first move, but why?
The point is White would like to play Bd3, but in the diagram position that loses a pawn to ...Qxd4.
White gets some compensation for the pawn, but the transaction is unlikely to prove profitable.
White could instead defend the pawn with 6.Nf3, which occurs 18.6% of the time, but that is not without its problems as the move makes the knight vulnerable to a later pin by ...Bg4, eg the main line in Mega26 after 6.Nf3 continues 6...Bd6 7.Bd3 0-0 8.0-0 Bg4, when Black has equalised, according to Stockfish17.1 and Dragon1.
After 6.c3 Bd6 7.Bd3 0-0 White usually plays 8.Qc2, which occurs 63.8% of the time (3,051 games out of 9,164).
After 8...Re8+ White plays 9.Ne2 an overwhelming 97.3% of the time (4,779 games out of 4,912).
Black then has to do something about his attacked h pawn, and he nearly always plays 9...h5, which gets the pawn off prise, as Nigel Davies is fond of saying, AND prepares to weaken White's castled position, assuming White castles short, which is usually the case.
Indeed, in 50.9% of the games (2,309 out of 4,539) White immediately plays 10.0-0.
Both sides having castled, it is a good moment to take stock
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
Despite Wikipedia boasting of Black's "rapid" development, it is White who has a slight edge in this department - both sides have castled, but White has in addition developed queen, bishop and knight, while Black has only developed rook and bishop.
True, it is Black to move, and Black could level the number of pieces developed, but instead Black normally plays 10...h4.
White in 1,213 games out of 1,790 (67.8%) defends the kingside with 11.h3, and Black replies 90% of the time with 11...Nd7.
White's 12.Bd2 occurs in 523 games out of 1,153 (45%) - but d2 it is not a great square for the bishop, although where else is it to go?
After 12...Nf8 (99.1%) 13.Rae1 (88%) Black's most common move, but by no means a consensus choice, is 13...Bc7 (147 games out of 497 - 29.6%), moving the king's bishop for the second time, while leaving most of the queenside undeveloped.
After 13...Bc7 Black has developed just two pieces,  the king's rook and bishop, against White's five pieces
Clearly, whatever Black is relying on in the main line of the Tartakower Variation, it is not rapid development.
The above position occurs 149 times in Mega26, with quite a few high-profile games, the highest-rated being Abhimanyu Mishra (2610) - Nodirbek Abdusattorov (2771), Fide Grand Swiss (Samarkand, Uzbekistan) 2025.
That continued 14.f4 Qd6 15.c4 b6 16.Rf3 Ne6 17.Be3 Bd7, bringing about the following position.
White has at least a slight edge, and possibly the upper hand, according to the engines
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
After 18.Red1 g6 19.c5 bxc5 20.dxc5 Qe7 Black was still to complete his development (the queen's rook is unmoved), and White took the chance to start an attack with 21.f5 Ng5 (21...gxf5 was better, according to the engines) 22.Bxg5 fxg5 23.fxg6 f6.
Now the engines reckon 24.Nd4 gives at least the upper hand. Instead 24.Bc4+ Kg7 25.Bf7 Red8 26.Rdf1 Qe5 27.Qc3 Bc8 resulted in an unclear middlegame, with equal chances, according to the engines.
They actually rate the position as completely even, and the game more-or-less stayed that way until being agreed drawn, with only kings left on the board (!), at move 69.
For the present, at least, the Tartakower Variation is here to stay.

Monday, 2 March 2026

Openings From Weimar IV

IN round four I was Black against Ralf Schober (2070), who chose Bird's Opening.
Wikipedia reckons "White's strategic ideas involve control of the e5-square, offering good attacking chances at the expense of slightly weakening" the kingside.
What the article does not mention is the move Bb5(+), which is a common idea in the Bird, especially when Black has played an early ...d5
Often the idea is to exchange the bishop for the black queen's knight, doubling Black's c pawns and increasing White's control of the e5 square.
Our game began 1.f4 c5 2.Nf3 d5 3.e3 g6.
This position occurs 430 times in ChessBase's 2026 Mega database
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
Three continuations feature more than 100 times: d4, Be2 and Bb5+.
Capablanca chose our game-continuation, 4.Bb5+, when he reached the position at New York 1931, even though Black has not committed the queen's knight.
The move is also the top choice of Stockfish17.1 and Dragon1, so it clearly has something going for it.
I replied 4...Bd7, and the game continued 5.Qe2 Nc6 6.Bxc6 Bxc6, after which White has increased control of e5, but has given up the bishop-pair without weakening Black's pawn-structure.
Black is slightly better, according to the engines
José Capablanca - Isador Turover, New York 1924, also featured 4...Bd7, but Capablanca answered 5.Bxd7+, which the engines reckon is slightly better than Qe2.
Nevertheless, after the further moves 5...Nxd7 6.Nc3 e6 7.e4 d4 8.Ne2 Ngf6 9.Ng3 h5, Black was slightly better, according to the engines, although White went on to win.
A lot of these moves seem counter-intuitive, at least to me, which may just show gaps in my chess understanding, but I suspect also point to the ideas-richness of chess.

Sunday, 1 March 2026

County Chess

PLAYED on board six (of 16) for Kent at Essex in the Southern Counties' U2050 championship yesterday afternoon.

John Moore (1978) - Spanton (1928)
Sicilian Closed
1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 g6!? 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 Nc6 5.d3 d6 6.f4 e6 7.Nf3 Nge7 8.0-0 0-0
This tabiya from the Closed Variation of the Sicilian Defence occurs 10,595 times in ChessBase's 2026 Mega database, with White scoring a disappointing 45%, albeit with a performance 15 elo above the white players' average rating
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
9.Be3 Nd4 10.e5!?
Moore (2050) - Spanton (2030), SCCU Essex-v-Sussex 2007, went 10.Rb1 Rb8 11.Ne2 Nec6 12.c3 Nxf3+ 13.Bxf3 Bd7 14.d4 cxd4 15.Nxd4!? a6 16.Qd2 Qc7 17.Rbd1, with a slight edge for White, according to Stockfish17.1 and Dragon1 (1-0, 45 moves).
The text is a sharp pseudo-sacrifice.
10...Nef5
There are 22 games in Mega26 with 10...Nxf3+ 11.Qxf3 dxe5 12.fxe5 Bxe5, but White gets the pawn back immediately with 13.Bxc5.
11.Bf2 Nxf3+ 12.Qxf3 Nd4 13.Qd1
How should Black proceed?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
13...d5
Richard Palliser in Starting Out: Closed Sicilian (Everyman 2006) awards 13...dxe5 an exclamation mark, saying Black should accept what is now a genuine sacrifice. After 14.fxe5 Bxe5 15.Ne4 White was scoring 60% in the 2005 version of Mega - and is also scoring 60% in the 2026 edition.
14.Qd2 Bd7 15.Nd1 Qc7!?
This may be a novelty. Known moves are 15...b6  and 15...Qe7.
16.c3 Nf5 17.g4 Ne7 18.d4
The engines like 18.Bg3, freeing the f2 square for White's knight.
18...cxd4
The engines agree this is better than 18...c4?, which they reckon is positionally losing, but they want Black to take immediate kingside action with 18...f5 or 18...f6.
19.cxd4 Rac8 20.Ne3 Bb5 21.Rfc1 Qb6 22.Rxc8!?
This is Dragon1's top choice, at least for a while; Stockfish17.1 prefers 22.Rc3 or 22.Re1!?
22...Rxc8 23.Bh4
The engines like rerouting the white knight to c3 via d1.
The point of the text is that after ...
23...Nc6
... the remaining white rook can be developed to the open file.
24.Rc1 Re8
But now d4 is under pressure.
25.Rd1
The engines are unsure whether to prefer this or 25.Nc2.
25...Bf8
How should White proceed?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
26.a3?
White should probably play 26.Kh2 or 26.Bf2, albeit the engines agree Black is at least equal.
26...Nxd4!?
This may be a tad better than 26...Ba4, but both moves win the d4 pawn.
27.Bf2 Ne2+ 28.Kh1 Qd8??
This turns a winning position into a losing one, or at least one in which White has the upper hand. The simple 28...Qa6 leaves Black the equivalent of about a minor piece ahead, according to the engines.
29.Bf1 Ba4
Best, since 29...d4? 30.Bxe2 Bxe2?! 31.Qxe2 leaves Black knight-for-pawn down, as the d pawn is pinned. Probably better is 30...Ba4, but 31.Qxd4 Bxd1 32.Nxd1 leaves Black down rook for bishop-and-knight, and with White having the bishop-pair. Black could also try 30...Bc6+, but 31.Ng2 again leaves Black knight-for-pawn down.
30.Bxe2 Bxd1 31.Nxd1!?
The engines agree this is the best way to recapture.
Now the dust has settled, as it were, how would you assess the position?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
White has bishop and knight for rook and pawn. This is a material advantage, even if that is not the case under the traditional 9:5:3:3:1 points system. In addition, White has the bishop-pair. But the advantages do not all lie with White. The black king is less exposed, and Black's extra pawn is a protected passer, albeit still in Black's side of the board. Dragon1 reckons White is winning, but Stockfish17.1 gives White 'only' the upper hand.
31...Qc7 32.Nc3
32.Qc3?! contests the open file, but an exchange of queens, while slightly favouring the bishops as being the only remaining pieces with long-range diagonal power, favours the rook even more as rooks are usually at their best in endings.
32...Rc8
Threatening 33...Bxa3!
33.Bd4 a6?!
Probably too slow. The immediate 33...Bc5, seeking to get rid of White's bishop-pair, is possible, as 34.Nb5 can be met by 34...Qb6. The engines also suggest 33...b5!?, the idea being to meet 34.Nxb5 with 34...Qc2 35.Qxc2 Rxc2 36.Bf1 Rd2 37.Bxa7 Rxb2, and 34.Bxb5 with 34...Bc5 35.Ba6 Bxd4!? 36.Qxd4 (36.Bxa8 Qc4!) Rb8, although in both cases the engines reckon White ends with at least a slight edge.
34.Kg2
After playing 33...a6?!, I feared 34.f5!, when 34...Bc5 can be met by 35.f6!, although 35...Kh8 keeps the game going.
34...Bc5 35.Kf2?!
White cannot maintain the bishop-pair, but probably better is 35.Bxc5 Qxc5 36.Bd3, when the engines claim the upper hand for White.
35...Qb6 36.Bxc5 Qxc5+ 37.Kg2 d4?!
The position is completely equal after 37...b5, according to the engines.
The problem with the text is that after ...
38.Ne4 Qc2?!
... White has ...
39.Bd3
This would also have been the answer to the probably better 38...Qc1!?
39...Qxd2+ 40.Nxd2 Rc1
How would you assess this ending?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
The black rook is the best piece on the board, but it is no match for two minor pieces, especially as White has the more active king, and Black's extra pawn, although passed, is unprotected. However, imbalanced positions can be tricky to play, and, while the engines start by claiming White is winning, Dragon1 comes to be less sure.
41.Kf2 Rd1 42.Ke2 Rg1 43.Be4 Rxg4?!
The engines come to much prefer 43...b5 or 43...b6.
44.Kf3?!
They reckon this loses much of White's advantage, which would be preserved by 44.Bxb7.
44...Rg1
44...h5!? might be better, the idea being to meet 45.Bxb7 with 45...Rh4, when 46.Kg3 Rg4+ 47.Kf3 Rh4 is a repetition, so the engines suggest 46.Ke2!? Rxh2+ 47.Kd3, with an unclear position, but one that seems good for White.
45.Kf2?
Definitely better is 45.Bxb7, eg 45...Rh1 46.Bxa6 Rxh2 47.Nc4, when the b pawn seems a lot quicker than the h pawn.
45...Rc1 46.Ke2
Or 46.Bxb7 Rc2 47.Ke2 Rxb2 48.Bxa6 Ra2, with complete equality, according to the engines.
46...b6 47.Nb3
Stockfish17.1 claims 47.Kd3 may give White a slight edge, or the better part of equality; Dragon1 disagrees.
What should Black play?
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
47...d3+!?
This pawn sacrifice, with both an interference motif and a diversion motif, is at first warmly greeted by the engines, but Dragon1 comes to see it as 'only' giving Black a slight edge, while Stockfish17.1 eventually concludes that the position is completely equal.
48.Kxd3
The king interferes with the bishop's coverage of b1, but the text is almost certainly better than 48.Bxd3?!, when the bishop is diverted from its coverage of h1. Then 48...Rh1 is strong, eg 49.Nd2 Rxh2 50.Ke3 a5, followed by pushing the h pawn.
48...Rb1 49.Kc2
This may appear to gain a a tempo on the rook, but does not really, whereas 49.Kc3! means Black will not be able to later capture on h2 with check, or play ...Rf2+ and then capture on h2. The point will become clearer as the game continues.
49...Rf1 50.Nd2
If the white king were on c3, White could play 50.Bd3 Rxf4 51.Bxa6, with good drawing chances, although Dragon1 is less sure about this than Stockfish17.1. Because the white king is on c2, the same line could continue 51...Rf2+ 52.Kc3 Rxh2, when Black is a vital tempo up, and, the engines agree, that makes Black's position easily winning.
50...Rxf4 51.Kd3 Rf2 52.h4 Rh2 53.b4 Rxh4
Black now has three pawns and a rook for bishop and knight, with an advantage the engines reckon is worth more than a minor piece
*****
*****
*****
*****
*****
54.Nf3 Rh1 55.a4 Ra1 56.Bc6 h6 57.Bd7 g5 58.Nd4 g4 59.a5?!
This loses a pawn, but does not greatly affect the engines' evaluation of the position.
59...bxa5 60.bxa5 Rxa5 61.Ke4 g3 62.Nf3 Kg7 63.Bc6 Rc5 64.Bb7 a5 65.Kf2 g2 66.Kg3 g1=Q+ 67.Nxg1 Rxe5 68.Nf3 Rb5 69.Bc6 Rb4 70.Nd2 a4 71.Be4 0-1 (Time)
Essex won the match 10-6.

Saturday, 28 February 2026

Spring Watch

HERE are my tournament plans for the next three months.

Mar 13-21 Bad Wörishofen seniors, Bavaria. Nine mostly-afternoon rounds with a time control of 40 moves in 90 minutes, plus 30 minutes to finish, and a 30-second increment throughout. The age limits in the announcements, both in German and English, are somewhat confused (the eligibility years quoted are 1966 and 1974), but are probably 60+ for men and 50+ for women.

Apr 3-6 4NCL Easter, Daventry, Northants. I have entered the U2000, which, like the open and U1700, has seven rounds, with a time control of 90 minutes and a 30-second increment. Only two halfpoint byes are allowed, so I will be playing two games on the Sunday.

Apr 19-28 World senior teams, Durres, Albania. I am playing for England 5 in the 65+ section, which, like the 50+, has nine afternoon rounds, with a free day after round five. The time control is 40 moves in 90 minutes, plus 30 minutes to finish, and a 30-second increment throughout. England 5 are seeded 43rd out of 51 entries, and, I am pleased to report, have four players, rather than five, which means no compulsory byes (unless we do really badly and the whole team gets a bye).

May 9-16 Bregenz, Austria. Seven morning rounds for men 60+ and women 55+, with a time control of 40 moves in 90 minutes, plus 30 minutes to finish, and a 30-second increment throughout. The 59 entries include five international masters.
Bregenz is on Lake Constance (Bodensee in German), and is probably best-known in German-speaking lands for its 'floating' opera stage, shown here under construction in 2017

May 27-Jun 4 Bad Neuenahr seniors, Rhineland-Palatinate. Nine mostly-morning rounds, with three sections: 50+, 65+ & 75+. The time control is 40 moves in 90 minutes, plus 30 minutes to finish, and a 30-second increment throughout. The sections have, respectively, 23, 65 and 44 entries.