Indeed, Black makes the identical dubious move, ...e5, albeit in a very different position.
In round one I here played 6...e5?!, and would have been at a disadvantage if my opponent had found, or had known, the clever reply 7.b4!? |
In round four my opponent was Black, and here played 8...e5?! |
In other words, Black has played ...e5 without spending a tempo on ...e6.
When that is the case, Stockfish16.1 and Dragon1 still like White's space advantage, reckoning White has the upper hand, being the equivalent of just over a pawn ahead.
But when it is White to move, as in my game, Dragon1 at first awards White a positionally won game, but backs down a little, agreeing with Stockfish16.1 that White's advantage is worth almost 1.4 pawns.
LESSON: moving a pawn or a piece for the second time in the opening needs to be justified by something the opponent has done. The fact that the move is desirable does not make it sound.
No comments:
Post a Comment